Pricing, stated plainly

Answer the size question and we'll say.

Revenue is the line that decides it. The boxes above are what make crossing it hurt sooner — they are not requirements, and ticking none of them is a perfectly normal answer. Pick a size and the answer appears here. It is allowed to be no.

This is the shape sku.io is built for.

You're past the revenue line and already carrying the complexity that makes it bite — that combination is what the product was built around, and it's where it pays for itself fastest. There is nothing else we would quietly check before saying yes on a call.

Worth a call, honestly.

The complexity is already here, and that's the part that hurts — it hurts at any size. You're under the $1M we usually quote as the starting point, but “roughly” is doing real work in that number. Tell us what the mess actually costs you and we'll say plainly whether it's time.

Yes — the checklist just isn't the reason.

Most of what sku.io does has nothing to do with juggling channels. At your size the purchasing and costing side usually carries it on its own: demand forecast per SKU with the math on screen, supplier POs drafted in a click, FIFO landed cost that closes the month in days rather than weeks. One clean channel makes that easier to run, not less worth running.

Not yet — and that's a real answer.

Smaller and simpler than where this starts paying for itself. A lighter inventory tool will genuinely serve you better for now, at a fraction of what this costs. Come back when the volume, the second channel, or the third stock location shows up.